All This Is My Cradle: An Interview With Danielle Janess

“Caddis,” our Silent Spring finalist, focuses on the caddisfly and then zooms out to examine a legacy of pollution and its impact on the natural world. It is a breathtaking poem, and we thoroughly enjoyed chatting with poet Danielle Janess about the background of this piece. Enjoy our conversation.

Rebecca Paredes: You submitted “Caddis” for our Silent Spring challenge, which asked writers to dig into themes of climate change and the world changing under our feet. How did that prompt inform this piece?

Danielle Janess: The impulse to write “Caddis” comes from my life and family. I grew up on lower Lake Huron, where I have vivid memories of caddisflies and mayflies, at a certain time of year, seeming to cover every exterior surface: screen doors, walls, windshields. They remind me of the feeling of peak spring and the turn into summer. For my father, who taught me to pay attention to the natural world, their hatch meant the start of trout fishing season. Caddisflies belong to the scientific order Trichoptera. They undergo four distinct metamorphoses, transforming at first in water (from egg to larva to pupa) before emerging into air as a winged, moth-like adult. A keystone species of the Great Lakes, they support cultural, recreational, and commercial fisheries. Because they spend most of their lives underwater, they are also highly sensitive to water pollution. I think almost constantly about Lake Huron and the St. Clair River—they are my lifeblood. The poem reckons with our human impact on the Great Lakes by looking at this one small but important insect. 

RP: This poem uses anadiplosis, a literary device where the last word of one line appears at the beginning of the next. To be honest, we geeked out about this in the Glossy Planet Slack channel—we loved how this device ties together the “weaving” mentioned in the epigraph and by the caddisfly, and how much that repetition transforms the poem when read aloud. All of that to say: can you talk about your decision to use this device?

DJ: If you watch a video of a caddisfly larva building its protective case, prepare to be amazed. While the grub itself is not the most attractive creature, they are wondrous little architects. The French artist Hubert Duprat famously “collaborated” with caddis larvae in the 1980s. He put them in aquariums alongside precious gemstones like pearls, rubies, lapis lazuli, and genuine gold flakes. The larvae then spun bejeweled sheaths from the gemstones, each one completely original. While not all Trichoptera build cases, those that do use materials that vary depending on their species and what’s available in the local water column. That could be minerals like sand or fine gravel, debris such as leaf bits and twigs, animal matter like snail shells and fish scales, or, as we now know, micro and nanoplastics.

In my youth I saw loads of caddisflies, but until recently I didn’t know about their intricate lives as aquatic artists. The more I learn about them, the more my appreciation deepens. I wanted to honor their way of being and making, so I played with different ways for the poem to approach the insect’s mode of assemblage. No one quite knows how they got their common name, “caddis.” But Merriam-Webster cites it as an old English noun, c.1500, for worsted yarn, ribbon, or binding, whereas Trichoptera comes from the Greek, meaning “hair-winged.” I got to thinking about hair, braids, weaves, and binding (the verb), which they do with the sticky silk from their mouths. One day, in a craft class led by Yvonne Blomer, it clicked. She mentioned a form in which the end of one line begins the next, which made me picture a weaving shuttle, and my mind flashed on the caddisfly. I also hope that the sense of motion afforded by the pattern conveys something of the forward-moving current in the St. Clair River. 

RP: “Caddis” both points out how we are interconnected and how our actions impact the broader ecosystem. In particular, I loved the shift into microplastics and how the poem highlights not only how omnipresent they are, but also how they become woven into the very bodies of humans and animals alike. Do these themes reappear in your other work, and if so, what draws you to them?

DJ: Your question hits on something I wrestle with both personally and in my current poetry project. 

What does it mean that I have inherited from the life-sustaining enormity of the Great Lakes and also from the violent appropriations of mega-polluters like Shell, Nova Chemicals, and Enbridge? 

In Learning to Die: Wisdom in the Age of Climate Crisis, the poet Jan Zwicky says that “love, awareness, and the desire to respond are distinguishable but inseparable.” Like it or not, because of my life and family, I am connected to the crimes of polluting corporations. For seventeen years, my father worked as a process operator at the Sarnia Shell refinery, among the world’s largest manufacturers of gasoline, distillates, liquid petroleum gas, heavy oils, pure chemicals, and solvents. I am keenly aware that his labor, along with my mother’s, provided for my upbringing and for our family’s home on the lake. He died in 2020 of multiple aggressive cancers. Studies show that men in our region experience cancer rates at thirty percent higher than the Canadian average.

In 2024, just outside my hometown of Sarnia-Lambton-Bkejwanong, Nova Chemicals opened a plastics production site that produces one billion pounds of brand-new plastic annually, in the form of polyethylene pellets, aka “nurdles.” Billions of these lentil-sized nurdles now litter creeks and stormwater routes that drain directly into the St. Clair River and Lake Huron, leaching yet more toxins into our environment, drinking water, and food chain. As for Enbridge, their badly aging Line 5 pipeline moves as much as 540,000 barrels of crude oil per day from Superior, Wisconsin, to the Sarnia refinery, snaking under the Straits of Mackinac and crossing under the St. Clair River through the heart of vital Great Lakes ecosystems. Over a fifty-year period, from 1967-2017, Enbridge’s Line 5 spilled over one-million gallons of oil. The Aamjiwnaang First Nation of Sarnia has opposed this pipeline since 1953 because it trespasses through their legal treaty territory.

While Line 5 predates my birth, I am old enough to remember our local beaches before they were strewn with polyethylene nurdles. I remember swimming in the lake before the invasive zebra and quagga mussels, brought into the Great Lakes by freighters from the Caspian Sea, filtered the water to its current clear blue by sucking up the phytoplankton and subsequently driving our native whitefish and trout populations to the brink of collapse. All this is my cradle, and it will be my grave.

RP: Is there anything else you’d like to share about this piece, or anything you’re working on now?

DJ: I’d like to share a few of the many living writers whose work contributes to this conversation. These include Rita Wong, whose poetry overlaps with water activism; Philip Kevin Paul, W̱SÁNEĆ Nation poet, whose work astonishes for its relationship to his home on Vancouver Island; Laurie D. Graham, whose poetry often investigates familial history and whose latest collection, Calling It Back To Me, I can’t wait to read; and Tim Lilburn, whose radically contemplative, linguistically-charged work, in essay collections like Living In The World As If It Were Home and poetry collections like The Names, invites the reader into wholly new heights of thinking.

Lastly, please let me say thank you again, Rebecca, and to all of you at Glossy Planet, for this meaningful recognition.

History Repeating Shortlist

Our History Repeating challenge asked for fiction, poetry, and nonfiction about cycles of destruction, recurring conflict, and what happens when those cycles break. We’re so pleased to bring you our shortlist, which recognizes the pieces that excited and moved us. Keep your eyes peeled next week for our finalists!

Underground Railroad Overground” by Scott Michael Black

A Black Mother Goes to the Hospital to Give Birth” by Juanita Cox

Army Sendoff” by Dario Cvencek

War Fatigue” by Martin Settle

Inheritance Pattern” by Veronica Tucker 

Fearsome Daughter” by Alise Versella

Subscribe to our newsletter to be the first to know about next month’s writing challenge!

History Repeating Finalists

Our May challenge, History Repeating, asked for writing that deals with repetition and the fracturing of time—and we were absolutely thrilled by the response. These finalists, representing fiction and poetry, a surprising twist on a coming-of-age story, a deeply moving meditation on “the smashed vase of history,” and an experimental piece built from software patch notes. You can read these pieces on our website at the end of June.

First place

“Patch Notes for the End of the World” by Kailum Graves

Second place

“Jukebox Rotation for War Days” by Marya Hornbacher

Third place

“Keloid” by Emily Dezurick-Badran

We’re excited to publish these finalists at the end of June. Can’t wait? Read our winners from past challenges, and sign up for our newsletter to be the first to know about upcoming calls for submissions and events.

Refusal as a Form of Tenderness: An Interview With Kailum Graves

Kailum’s hybrid work, “Patch Notes for the End of the World,” starts at the beginning of human civilization and zooms into a singular, essential interaction between an adult and child. The scale of this piece, and how it manages to straddle both humor and heart so deftly, captured our attention during our reading, and we’re thrilled to share this interview with the author. Read Kailum’s winning work, and then take a peek behind the patch notes.

Rebecca Paredes: You submitted this piece for our History Repeating challenge, which asked writers to explore cycles of destruction and what happens when that cycle breaks. How did that prompt inform your work?

Kailum Graves: The prompt immediately made me think about repetition at different scales—historical, political, domestic, emotional. I was interested in the way the same patterns of harm can keep reappearing in new language, new institutions, new rooms. A war becomes a family system. A family system becomes a sentence someone says to a child.

What drew me to the challenge was the final question: what happens when the cycle breaks? I didn’t want the answer to be grand or triumphant. I wanted the break to be almost unbearably small—a pause, a refusal, a hand opening instead of closing. The piece is really about that tiny, difficult moment when someone inherits an old script and chooses not to perform it.

RP: We loved that this piece uses patch notes, which developers use to detail changes with each software update. How did you land on this as your structure?

KG: I liked the coldness of patch notes as a form. They’re so functional and tidy—added this, removed that, known issue, minor fix. There’s something both funny and horrifying about applying that language to human history and inherited harm. The structure let me move quickly through huge ideas without having to explain them in a traditional narrative way. It also gave the piece a kind of bureaucratic absurdity, which felt right for the subject. So much violence is made possible by systems that describe terrible things in very clean language. Patch notes became a way to expose the gap between the neatness of the record and the mess of what actually happened.

RP: You described this work as “hybrid microfiction/prose poem,” which is spot-on—there are so many knockout lines in here, like “Added drawers that slam like verdicts” and “Children now able to recite the year a war began while failing to identify the sound of one starting in their own home.” This is a long way of saying, do you tend to write pieces that blend genres, and if so, what draws you to it?

KG: I’m very drawn to hybrid forms. I think some subjects resist behaving as only fiction or only poetry or only essays. Sorrow, heartache, trauma, love, memory—they rarely arrive in clean categories, so I like forms that can blur or fracture a little. I often find myself starting with a strange premise or structure and then using it to get at something emotionally direct. In this case, the patch notes gave me permission to be compressed, funny, bleak, and lyrical at once. Genre-blending lets me follow the emotional logic of a piece rather than the rules of a single form. It can make room for jokes and devastation to sit uncomfortably close together, which feels very human to me.

RP: Is there anything else you’d like to share about this piece, or anything you’re working on now?

KG: I think the piece is ultimately about refusal as a form of tenderness. Not a perfect cure, not a clean redemption, but a small interruption in an old pattern. I’m interested in the idea that history does not only repeat through governments and wars, but through gestures, rooms, tones of voice, and the things people do not know they have inherited.

At the moment, I’m working across fiction, poetry, and television. I’m especially interested in speculative and uncanny premises that open into very human questions: how people survive themselves, how humor works as an emergency device, and how tenderness can appear in places where it was never properly installed.

Gender Trouble Shortlist

Our Gender Trouble challenge asked for writers to pull apart gender categories: heteronormativity, conformity, roles, and bodies. We’re excited to share our shortlist, which celebrates the writers whose work lingered with us long after reading. Our finalists will be announced tomorrow!

Cock as Personal Menagerie” by Ro White

Disorientations” by Jennifer M Phillips

The Mechanics of Flight” by Gary Mitchell

Subscribe to our newsletter to be the first to know about our next writing challenge!

Gender Trouble Finalists

Our Gender Trouble writing challenge invited writers to pull apart the categories: gender and sex, heteronormativity and transgression, the body we were assigned and the one we actually inhabit—and our finalists delivered. We’re pleased to present our winning writers, with work ranging from poetry about names and chosen identity to a short story that lives in the footnotes. Join us in celebrating these writers, and read their work on our website at the end of July!

First place

“Hermaphroditism and Culling Adaptations of the Blue-Banded Hawk” by Ophelia Wong

Second place

“Autogynepygmaliac” by Val Cossey

Third place

“By Any Other Name” by Bron Bateman

Stay in the know about future challenges, winners, and writing resources by signing up for our newsletter.

The Lit Mag Submission Kit (Free Guide)

You’re ready to submit your story, essay, or poem, but the lit mag is asking for a cover letter and bio. What is that? How do you write one? Our Lit Mag Submission Kit is a free, practical guide to writing your cover letter and bio for literary magazine submissions. It’s compiled by editors who read hundreds of them every month. And did we mention that it’s free?

You’ll get:

  • What to include (and what to leave out) in your cover letter and bio
  • Templates for prose and poetry
  • Templates for short and long bios
  • And all the examples and tips you need to get started.

Just enter your email below to download the submission kit. (Check your spam folder if you haven’t received the download link.)

You’ll also be subscribed to the Glossy Planet newsletter, where you’ll learn about our monthly writing challenges ($1,300 total awarded!), winning work, craft articles, and more. 

Free Download

Send download link to:

Required: Subscribe me to the Glossy Planet newsletter. Unsubscribe anytime.

Still Writing the Hard Things: 4 More Techniques

In the first part of this series, I discussed how the act of writing is a vulnerable one—this truth feels extra tender for me in this moment.

As I sit down to write the second half of this article, I’m grieving someone I wasn’t expecting to lose and processing the fact that one of my favourite people in the whole world has now lost their soulmate. The entire situation feels ironic, given that this series was pitched and planned long in advance. But here we are, in the tough stuff together, and hopefully this series will support us both in some small way to write the hard things.

1. Let it out

When I first read Gray Davidson Carroll’s “Queer Poetry,” I was utterly blown away. You can practically hear them speaking through clenched teeth, that frustration saturates the entire poem. So, it made sense to me when I learned that the piece was composed in just 15 intense minutes—sometimes, words just need to be let loose.

This approach involves relinquishing form and control to engage deeply and untidily with the topic or emotion. Think meditative stream of consciousness, rage writing, or the unedited frantic filling of blank pages guided by whichever thoughts and feelings happen to pass through you. Try leaving perfectionism, careful word choice, syntax, and grammar at the door. The goal here is to remove that internal censorship and restriction that keeps us from expressing difficult things.

However, because this method can be so emotionally intense, I wouldn’t recommend trying it out at your local coffee shop for the first time. Instead, find a space where you can cry, scream, cuddle a favorite pet or person, take a nap, and whatever else you need to do post-session.

I’d suggest Natalie Goldberg’s Writing Down the Bones as a great resource if you’re interested in creating a writing practice grounded in this approach.

2. Let your draft breathe

Giving that first draft or an unfinished piece some time and space to rest works particularly well when paired with the approach above. But honestly, this practice is useful for any piece or manuscript. I’m a strong believer in returning to a finished work after a good night’s sleep—something magical happens when you let words marinate for a while.

Also, when we’re right in the thick of writing hard things, those feelings are going to be heavy and overwhelming. Taking some time away from a piece lets us regulate, process, and come back when we’re ready. This way, you can return later, prepared to edit with some more emotional distance.

3. Embrace absurdism

The most terrible experiences are also often the most senseless. We try to find some shred of logic or meaning in these moments. But trauma, violence, and loss resist the coherent narratives and linearity we attempt to force them into. What if, instead of working against this senselessness, we let it become a hallmark of the writing itself?

When writing about hard things, let the absurdity, illogicality, uncertainty, and fragmentation shine through, rather than putting your energy into creating a tidy piece. Embrace features like contradiction, non-sequitur, associative leaps, dream logic, discontinuity, and shifting perspectives.

This approach is not only a great way to overcome writer’s block, but it can also be a feature that reflects experiences with more complexity.

Some examples to learn from:

 4. Take care of yourself

Writing about difficult things like trauma and oppression are taxing on the mind, body, and soul. While this work is undoubtedly important, how do we make sure we balance this with our own well-being?

Firstly, I’d encourage you to take lots of breaks and pace yourself. Write a little at a time and step away completely if you need to. If something feels too fresh or raw to write about, give it some time. Allow yourself to process emotionally before you try to put it on the page. 

As much as Glossy Planet wants to read your wonderful work, sometimes, taking care of yourself looks like not writing (or at least not writing about certain subjects). Always prioritize your basic needs over submission deadlines.

Also, remember that not all writing needs to be about the hard stuff—in fact, it shouldn’t be. Find a balance between writing difficult things in addition to pieces that are joyous, funny, and comforting. This is one of the points Davidson Carroll makes in “Queer Poetry,” saying in their contributor’s note:

“Our lives are not only the worst things ever done to us.”

Sign up for our summer flash fiction workshop, “Urgent Writing,” led by writer and poet Jaclyn Desforges. 

Evolutionary Contradiction: An Interview With Ophelia Wong

Ophelia’s winning piece, “Hermaphroditism and Culling Adaptations of the Blue-Banded Hawk,” begins as a fictionalized academic article, and then shifts to discuss gender dynamics, performance, and familial roles—all within the footnotes. We’re happy to share this interview with the author, who takes us behind the scenes of this layered work.

Rebecca Paredes: You submitted this piece for our Gender Trouble challenge, which asked writers to pull apart gender categories: heteronormativity, roles, and bodies. How did that prompt inform this story?

Ophelia Wong: The prompt naturally channeled me into the works of Judith Butler. In Performative Acts and Gender Constitution, she poses a question, paraphrased here: whether to be a woman is, by social definition, to be in an oppressed situation. I crafted my story while being unable to get her words out of my mind. I wished to sever the definition of woman from oppressive gender roles, revealing how patriarchal imbalances of power have no biological basis and are socially conditioned. I also aimed to expose and dismantle heteronormative ideology that perpetuates patriarchal hierarchies on a familial level.

RP: The framing device for this piece is an academic article about the blue-banded hawk, but the footnotes tell a coming-of-age story. How did you land on that structure? As far as I can tell, the blue-banded hawk is fictional—was this based on the dynamics of a real species? 

OW: The blue-banded hawk is based on two species — Harris’s hawk and the blue-banded goby. The former is the only matriarchal and social raptor species, while the latter is a hermaphrodite fish species. In a social group, the largest female goby may change sex to replace the single dominant male and will assume sex-linked roles, such as caring for offspring. By drawing on the social dynamics of these two species, I could reshape relationships between behavior and sex and gender. I settled on creating the blue-banded hawk, rather than the Harris’s goby, as birds are better known for sexual dimorphism and imbalanced courtship behaviors.

The academic structure of my piece reflects my realization that non-heteronormativity is accepted as a natural fact in every species but ours. Presented with a scientific article on sexual ambiguity and transitions within blue-banded hawks, we might show impartiality, or even interest. Yet by replacing the hawk with a human, this very evolutionary phenomenon becomes unnatural and disputable. By integrating a coming-of-age narrative, I underscore the irony of rejecting a natural phenomenon but accepting the destructive consequences of our rigid gender roles—the real evolutionary contradiction.

RP: In the footnotes, cooking and eating function as a clear way that gender roles exist and are ultimately subverted. Can you talk about your thought process with food in the footnotes compared to how the blue-banded hawk approaches feeding? I’m thinking about these lines, which change so much once we read the accompanying footnote: “Though biologically greater in size, females often display fasting behaviors.3 This stereotypic behavior is hypothesized to be a stress response.”

OW: Through these lines, I convey how social enforcement of gender expectations can often be harmful and counterintuitive to maintaining biological and psychological health. In the footnotes, I explore how women are socially conditioned to reject biological changes, such as weight gain or physical manifestations of age, while the biological growth and nutritional requirements of men are adequately supported from youth.

Within both my protagonist’s family and the kettle of the blue-banded hawk, offspring feast on the labor and sacrifice of the mother, inherited by her daughters. When male hawks seize food from the dominant female, the female, other males, and offspring, lose out. I wished to reflect how this polarizing imbalance of gender roles is also detrimental for father and son, who become unable to provide for themselves and deprived of strong familial bonds. By disrupting the motif of cooking, when the protagonist instead buys food for her sister, I wished to convey how adequate nurture can occur without extensive domestic labor. Ultimately, I endeavored to reassert my belief that the redistribution of domestic duties and dissolution of gender expectations would be greatly beneficial for social and evolutionary longevity.

RP: Is there anything else you’d like to share about this piece, or anything you’re working on now?

OW: I’m currently polishing up a few past works so they are ready for publication online! I have a few vignettes arising from recurring dreams, a sonnet inspired by a rat dissection, and stories stemming from disjointed phrases that have tumbled into my head. And as always, I’m chipping away at the same fantasy manuscript I’ve been working on since forever. It’s a very different genre, but similarly a social commentary—an exploration of prejudice and systemic injustice, gender identity and family, all alongside a heavy dose of sorcery. You can keep up with my writing @the.poets.narcissus on Instagram! 

I am beyond grateful for the support from you and your team, and the space—fortified against AI—that you have crafted for writers to express their works. If nothing else, I implore readers to interrogate entrenched social beliefs—whether they manifest as misinformed prejudices or oppressive conventions. As Butler asserts, we must disentangle our perceptions of minority groups from narratives of marginalization.

Cost of Living Shortlist

It’s expensive to live, and even more expensive to fall behind. Our Cost of Living challenge invited flash prose and poetry about debt and making ends meet. Our shortlist recognizes the writers whose work we particularly loved, and we’re pleased to share their titles. Check back soon for our list of finalists!

A, Apple, tuffaHah” by Maryah Converse

American Tantalus” by Bobby Sorensen

Foreclosure” by Robert John Miller

Test Suite: Quality” by Maximilian Peerless

Subscribe to our newsletter to be the first to know about our next writing challenge.

BAD MEDICINE 💊 Our call for submissions closes Sept. 15!

X