Evolutionary Contradiction: An Interview With Ophelia Wong

Ophelia’s winning piece, “Hermaphroditism and Culling Adaptations of the Blue-Banded Hawk,” begins as a fictionalized academic article, and then shifts to discuss gender dynamics, performance, and familial roles—all within the footnotes. We’re happy to share this interview with the author, who takes us behind the scenes of this layered work.

Rebecca Paredes: You submitted this piece for our Gender Trouble challenge, which asked writers to pull apart gender categories: heteronormativity, roles, and bodies. How did that prompt inform this story?

Ophelia Wong: The prompt naturally channeled me into the works of Judith Butler. In Performative Acts and Gender Constitution, she poses a question, paraphrased here: whether to be a woman is, by social definition, to be in an oppressed situation. I crafted my story while being unable to get her words out of my mind. I wished to sever the definition of woman from oppressive gender roles, revealing how patriarchal imbalances of power have no biological basis and are socially conditioned. I also aimed to expose and dismantle heteronormative ideology that perpetuates patriarchal hierarchies on a familial level.

RP: The framing device for this piece is an academic article about the blue-banded hawk, but the footnotes tell a coming-of-age story. How did you land on that structure? As far as I can tell, the blue-banded hawk is fictional—was this based on the dynamics of a real species? 

OW: The blue-banded hawk is based on two species — Harris’s hawk and the blue-banded goby. The former is the only matriarchal and social raptor species, while the latter is a hermaphrodite fish species. In a social group, the largest female goby may change sex to replace the single dominant male and will assume sex-linked roles, such as caring for offspring. By drawing on the social dynamics of these two species, I could reshape relationships between behavior and sex and gender. I settled on creating the blue-banded hawk, rather than the Harris’s goby, as birds are better known for sexual dimorphism and imbalanced courtship behaviors.

The academic structure of my piece reflects my realization that non-heteronormativity is accepted as a natural fact in every species but ours. Presented with a scientific article on sexual ambiguity and transitions within blue-banded hawks, we might show impartiality, or even interest. Yet by replacing the hawk with a human, this very evolutionary phenomenon becomes unnatural and disputable. By integrating a coming-of-age narrative, I underscore the irony of rejecting a natural phenomenon but accepting the destructive consequences of our rigid gender roles—the real evolutionary contradiction.

RP: In the footnotes, cooking and eating function as a clear way that gender roles exist and are ultimately subverted. Can you talk about your thought process with food in the footnotes compared to how the blue-banded hawk approaches feeding? I’m thinking about these lines, which change so much once we read the accompanying footnote: “Though biologically greater in size, females often display fasting behaviors.3 This stereotypic behavior is hypothesized to be a stress response.”

OW: Through these lines, I convey how social enforcement of gender expectations can often be harmful and counterintuitive to maintaining biological and psychological health. In the footnotes, I explore how women are socially conditioned to reject biological changes, such as weight gain or physical manifestations of age, while the biological growth and nutritional requirements of men are adequately supported from youth.

Within both my protagonist’s family and the kettle of the blue-banded hawk, offspring feast on the labor and sacrifice of the mother, inherited by her daughters. When male hawks seize food from the dominant female, the female, other males, and offspring, lose out. I wished to reflect how this polarizing imbalance of gender roles is also detrimental for father and son, who become unable to provide for themselves and deprived of strong familial bonds. By disrupting the motif of cooking, when the protagonist instead buys food for her sister, I wished to convey how adequate nurture can occur without extensive domestic labor. Ultimately, I endeavored to reassert my belief that the redistribution of domestic duties and dissolution of gender expectations would be greatly beneficial for social and evolutionary longevity.

RP: Is there anything else you’d like to share about this piece, or anything you’re working on now?

OW: I’m currently polishing up a few past works so they are ready for publication online! I have a few vignettes arising from recurring dreams, a sonnet inspired by a rat dissection, and stories stemming from disjointed phrases that have tumbled into my head. And as always, I’m chipping away at the same fantasy manuscript I’ve been working on since forever. It’s a very different genre, but similarly a social commentary—an exploration of prejudice and systemic injustice, gender identity and family, all alongside a heavy dose of sorcery. You can keep up with my writing @the.poets.narcissus on Instagram! 

I am beyond grateful for the support from you and your team, and the space—fortified against AI—that you have crafted for writers to express their works. If nothing else, I implore readers to interrogate entrenched social beliefs—whether they manifest as misinformed prejudices or oppressive conventions. As Butler asserts, we must disentangle our perceptions of minority groups from narratives of marginalization.

Hermaphroditism and Culling Adaptations of the Blue-Banded Hawk

An evolutionary anomaly, the blue-banded hawk (Parabuteo discinctus) has long flown under the radar. Sexually dimorphic in adulthood yet displaying hermaphroditism as a fledgling, there is much to examine concerning the social and reproductive behaviours contributing to their decline. 

Blue-banded hawks are raised in kettles consisting of a single adult female, adult males, and hermaphrodite youth. Whereas the female labors considerably to nurture her offspring,1 adult males only interact with the brood when they are being fed, snatching insects from the mother’s mouth.2 As a consequence of this confounding adaptation, many chicks do not reach adulthood. 

A female hawk may be identified by two iridescent blue-grey bands on her rectrices. Such distribution of visual attractiveness is atypical in species displaying anisogamy, with females also producing macrogametes. Though biologically greater in size, females often display fasting behaviors.3 This stereotypic behavior is hypothesized to be a stress response.

Until maturity, fledglings exhibit simultaneous hermaphroditism. Protandry, defined by the increased secretion of female sex hormones and the suppression of male sex hormones, is induced when the sole female in the kettle is unable to provide.4 These sex changes mark adulthood, and have been observed to occur only once in a hawk’s lifetime. Protogyny, the counterpart to protandry, has no clear causative factors. Under the care of an adequate female, fledglings mature primarily into male individuals. If an adequate female is already present in a kettle, protandrous fledglings are cast out.5 Lone females become vulnerable to predators 6and the aggression of other hawks.7 

As hermaphrodites, fledglings simply mimic adult traits.8 However, upon reaching maturity, males cease allopreening and social behaviors beyond feeding and physical conflict.9 Such violence over the possession of a lone female mirrors the female’s imperative to mate and raise a kettle for survival.10 This violence, contradictory to Darwinian evolution, extends within a kettle, lowering the survival rates of both offspring and adults. 

Blue-banded hawk populations are fragmented and facing extinction, as a consequence of stress, ostracism, and aggression in adult individuals. Hermaphrodite offspring appear to have greater fitness for survival, performing social behaviors for the benefit of the kettle. Fledglings have been observed to ensure smaller individuals are first provided for. There is emerging evidence of fledglings attempting hunting and feeding behaviors out of curiosity, rather than duty.11 It is perhaps in the best interest of the population, and in accordance with Darwinian evolution, for the blue-banded hawk to retain the hermaphroditism of its youth.12 

  1. I’d wake every morning to smoke and searing oil—my mother frying eggs on the stove. She’d ask me to set the table. My brother would wake at noon and complain that the eggs had gone cold. ↩︎
  2. Before she’d moved out, my sister and I would cook on the weekends. Our dad ate his dinner with one hand, sitting at the table on his laptop. As always, he was writing emails or cursing shouldn’t have hired her or on a work call. 
    ↩︎
  3. My mother would watch her wrinkles grow in the mirror and moan about the fat she couldn’t get rid of. She’d serve herself half a bowl of rice and serve my brother two. ↩︎
  4. When my mother came down with the flu, I found her in the kitchen, heating the stove, before I’d told her to go to bed. My brother scarfed down the eggs after I’d scrambled them and asked why mum had changed her recipe. ↩︎
  5. My sister invited me first to her new home—a closeted apartment paid off with her own money. Rent was at $530 a week. We laid on her bare mattress under the window, side by side, birds disappearing into clouds. ↩︎
  6. I’d dropped my jacket on the road and a car honked to alert me. I ignored it at first, certain it was another man rolling down his window to yell blow us a kiss, babe. ↩︎
  7. Give us a kiss before we go. My uncle opened his arms, waiting at the door for his embrace. His wife’s arms were laden with bags, her right hand seized by their child. ↩︎
  8. My sister invited me first to meet her child. The curtains in the nursery were closed and I huddled with her, in the dark, beside the cot. She broke down in my arms. The baby, hearing his mother cry, began crying too. ↩︎
  9. Since and long after her second trimester, my sister had been reliant on her husband’s income. My mother, when invited over, criticized her for the unwashed dishes. I began washing the dishes. My brother, when offered, held the baby like a wet dishrag. ↩︎
  10. Again, my mother asked when I would give her another grandchild. My worst nightmares are her waking moments. But I couldn’t tell her that. Instead, I told her I did not like men. She paled, almost fainting. She told me not to joke about that. 
    ↩︎
  11. I brought my sister her favorite meal—an entire plate of honey chicken, two bowls of rice. My sister laughed in delight. The baby, hearing his mother laugh, began laughing too. ↩︎
  12. At noon, my brother wanders into the kitchen, peers at the empty pan on the stove, and asks if we’re running low on eggs. “No,” I say. “I didn’t cook any for you.” ↩︎

Autogynepygmaliac

He wants to be a painting of a pale woman. 

He wants to look into the eyes of Medusa and 
watch as his body slowly transforms into 
the marble figure of Venus de Milo. 

He wants her body to be sandwiched between oil and canvas and 
she wants to be hung in the Musée D’Orsay and 
make European teenagers on class trips have 
sexual realizations and awakenings. 

She wants his perfection to be scrutinized by an art collector who 
holds a magnifying glass in one hand and an erection in the other. 

She wants to be a Greek myth. 
She wants his balls to be ripped to shreds by vultures at the end of each day, over and over. 

She wants to be still and dry and lounging on a fresh coat of paint but 
she doesn’t want to be the subject of some 
pastel and coy Rococo. 

She wants to be confident and unabashedly stare at the viewer with a smirk because she knows that he is a
piece of fine art, painted or sculpted by one of those undeniable greats and

who are you to be looking at him? Why are you staring? She knows you’re staring. She’s not a piece of pornography. He transcends pornography. Masturbation wouldn’t do him justice. She is a hyper-pornographic, forever-to-be-preserved-and-cherished, hyper-artistic piece of spiritual wet bliss and euphoria. A Trojan Magnum opus. 

The wooden floorboards of an art museum creak more slowly but with the same rhythm as a spring
mattress being pounded with the love of two people. 

By Any Other Name

Sometimes a peach is just a peach 
Sometimes a peach is a portal.
If I call a peach something other than a peach
do its juices still run down my chin?
Does it still sit sticky in my mouth?

I think of your dead name, 
how your father and I had searched the baby book
looking for the perfect name for you, a run 
of black letters on the page,
pleasing curves and sounds,
an orange-fleshed word sweet on our tongues,
how it seemed made for you.
When I think of you now, it’s never with that name
in my mouth. That name is an absence, 
shrivelled and brown,
a fly-blown fruit rotting on the ground.

A tree is a tree for its browns and greens, its cuts of sun
through branches, its soft bark against our fingers.
You are sugar-sweet buds on 
a spring blossom tree,
renewed every day.

A peach, 
a peach, 
a peach 
and
a portal.

Gender Trouble Finalists

Our Gender Trouble writing challenge invited writers to pull apart the categories: gender and sex, heteronormativity and transgression, the body we were assigned and the one we actually inhabit—and our finalists delivered. We’re pleased to present our winning writers, with work ranging from poetry about names and chosen identity to a short story that lives in the footnotes. Join us in celebrating these writers, and read their work on our website at the end of July!

First place

“Hermaphroditism and Culling Adaptations of the Blue-Banded Hawk” by Ophelia Wong

Second place

“Autogynepygmaliac” by Val Cossey

Third place

“By Any Other Name” by Bron Bateman

Stay in the know about future challenges, winners, and writing resources by signing up for our newsletter.

Gender Trouble Shortlist

Our Gender Trouble challenge asked for writers to pull apart gender categories: heteronormativity, conformity, roles, and bodies. We’re excited to share our shortlist, which celebrates the writers whose work lingered with us long after reading. Our finalists will be announced tomorrow!

Cock as Personal Menagerie” by Ro White

Disorientations” by Jennifer M Phillips

The Mechanics of Flight” by Gary Mitchell

Subscribe to our newsletter to be the first to know about our next writing challenge!

BAD MEDICINE 💊 Our call for submissions closes Sept. 15!

X