Cost of Living Finalists

How do you live within your means when the means just aren’t there? For our Cost of Living challenge, we sought prose and poetry about money, need, and affording to live. We’re excited to announce our finalists, who took inventive and thought-provoking angles on this challenge theme. Their work spans poetry and experimental fiction, and we’re thrilled to publish these pieces at the end of August!

First place

“Money Trees” by Marnetta Singleton

Second place

“Hushes and Hums in Texas” by Zenobia

Third place

In Situ” by Jessica Hincapié

Stay in the know about future challenges, winners, and writing resources by signing up for our newsletter.

The Cringe, the Bad, and the Ugly: Why You Should Keep Bad Writing

As creatives, we know all too well that failure is a part of the artistic process, and that “good” writing is necessarily preceded by an avalanche of very bad writing. This is simply the reality of learning, growing, making, and experimenting. But beyond learning and practice, I’d like to make the case that even your roughest of pieces are worth holding onto. Yes, even when your brain is screaming at you to burn it down before anyone else has the chance to read it.

Keep it all

Sometimes, a piece just isn’t working. Maybe it’s been rejected by every publication you’ve sent it out to, or maybe that piece you were certain was your magnum opus is beginning to look more like a lab experiment gone terribly wrong. Regardless, it’s at this point that most writers get the impulse to scrap it all and start over. I’ve personally written an uncountable number of pieces I can barely stand to look at now. 

But instead of hitting delete—hear me out—resist the impulse. Instead, hoard those weird tarnished pieces, the nonsensical sentence fragments, the overwrought poems, the cliches and incoherent brain dumps. Become a literary dragon atop a mountain of crumpled pages and half-full notebooks.

Give your “bad” writing a home

About a year ago, I got in the practice of moving retired poems, prose, and rough idea documents to a folder I have fondly named “Graveyard.” Occasionally, I visit the Graveyard when I’m in need of inspiration or feeling blocked. 

At first, this was uncomfortable, these were afterall, not my best works. But now it’s become a habit, digging for small treasures within a genuinely terrible poem, or returning to an old piece I gave up on with new perspectives or methods. I’ve found new life in a lot of writing I originally had the impulse to cast into the abyss.

Recently, I took a wonderful poetry workshop with Jaclyn Desforges called “This Poem is a Compost Heap: Writing decay and regeneration.” (She also recently taught a class with Glossy Planet!) In this workshop, Jaclyn reframed how writing, instead of being neat and clean, can be a site of rot, decay, and decomposition that leads to regeneration and transformation. She encouraged us to rework old pieces, weave poems together, and just generally play in the muck of our writing. I came out of this workshop with a new poem that I genuinely loved and a newfound appreciation for the ways old writing can nourish new work.

So, call it whatever you like—graveyard, compost heap, dragon’s den, storage locker, or even a swamp—but get in the practice of keeping everything you write (even when you find yourself cringing outwardly as you read it).

An extra reason to keep it all

Just in case you needed one more reason to hold onto any “bad” writing, consider just how fluid and subjective these assessments can be. What we label as “bad” one day may have just been a case of poor self-esteem after one too many rejections, a difficult week at work, or excessive comparison to others. We are constantly learning as writers. What you see as “bad” today could have potential in the future.

The point is that sometimes we judge our own writing wrongly. If you resist that impulse to click delete, then that piece you evaluated hangrily after skipping both breakfast and lunch can thankfully, still be resurrected from the Graveyard later. And if it is indeed, “bad” writing, who’s to say it can’t find some new life?

Keep up with our free resources for writers by signing up for our newsletter, and add our next call for submissions to your calendar.

Accidental Little Fragments: An Interview With Marnetta Singleton

“Money Trees” surprised us in so many ways—namely, how it manages to convey so much tension and humor in so little space. We were thrilled to chat with writer Marnetta Singleton about how this hybrid piece came to life. Read her work, and then enjoy our conversation.

Rebecca Paredes: You submitted “Money Trees” for our Cost of Living challenge, which asked writers to explore debt and the perpetual cycle of finding ways to afford to live. How did that prompt inform this story?

Marnetta Singleton: When I started thinking about a modern way to explore the cost of living, the phone felt like the most natural place to begin. We receive our bills, receipts, payment confirmations, overdraft warnings, and those dreaded “payment didn’t go through” messages through our phones.

But the more I thought about it, the more I realized that our phones don’t only reveal our financial situations. They reveal our personal situations, too. They tell on our relationships, our health, our movements, our interests, and sometimes, things we would never willingly explain to another person. A phone can become a passive storyteller of your life.

I wanted readers to experience the emotional rhythm of those notifications firsthand. There is the panic of seeing that a payment didn’t go through or that your account has been overdrawn, followed by that small burst of joy when money finally comes in. Then, almost immediately, that money already has somewhere else to go. Instead of watching the protagonist’s financial situation from the outside, the reader is placed inside a simulated version of it.

Money also becomes a form of communication in the story. Through the Cash App payments and the notes attached to them, we begin to understand her relationships, her obligations, and the power dynamics between her and the people around her. Entire conversations are happening through money.

The prompt ultimately made me question what it actually costs to live. The protagonist isn’t only paying financially. She is paying mentally, emotionally, physically, and spiritually. Sometimes the cost of living is everything you have to put yourself through just to keep going.

RP: We were universally obsessed with how this narrative unravels across phone notifications, and I loved just how much insight we get into the protagonist’s life through these snippets. There are so many different forms of communication in this piece: texts and phone calls, but also messages in the notes of Cash App payments. At the same time, we physically move through the story with notifications from Maps and the Ring camera. The end result is way more effective than if we had solely read a series of text message notifications, for instance. On a craft level, how did you approach weaving together these different types of notifications, such as group texts and Pinterest, or Cash App and Boost?

MS: There are a lot of nosy people in this world, including me. There is a voyeuristic thrill in being allowed into something so private. It almost feels like going through someone’s mail, which is illegal, or snooping through someone’s room.

I was inspired by epistolary storytelling, where stories are told through letters or found documents, as well as screenlife stories and fiction told through text message threads. In many screenlife stories, we actively watch the protagonist interact with the technology. We see them typing, clicking, opening apps, or moving from one screen to another.

In “Money Trees,” we never directly watch the protagonist use her phone. We only see the notifications created by her actions and by the things happening around her. The phone is passively telling on her.

I wanted readers to play detective and put the puzzle together themselves. I carefully threaded the notifications together so that each one performed a different job. Maps creates physical movement. The Ring notification introduces danger and surveillance. Cash App reveals both financial circumstances and relationships, allowing money itself to function like dialogue. Duolingo, Pinterest, music, job notifications, subscriptions, and the other alerts reveal her interests, ambitions, personality, and the kind of life she is trying to create.

I wanted to give readers just enough information to build a complete picture of her without taking away the work of their imagination. I think the reader’s imagination is one of the most powerful parts of storytelling. The piece works more like a map than a guided tour. You have to pay attention and make connections because simply scanning the notifications won’t reveal the full story.

My attention span also played a role. Mine isn’t always the greatest, so I’m naturally drawn to storytelling that moves quickly and gets directly to the point. Notifications allowed me to create something fast-paced and fragmented without losing emotional depth.

They have also become a shared visual language for smartphone users, especially people who use iPhones. Our brains already understand the shape and meaning of an overdraft warning, a Cash App payment, a missed call, or a Ring notification almost instantly. I didn’t have to stop and explain what every alert meant because readers already encounter this language in their everyday lives.

The idea also came from a familiar and slightly embarrassing experience. You can be showing someone a completely innocent picture on your phone when a notification suddenly pops up and reveals something you never intended for them to know. That made me wonder how much of someone’s life could be revealed through those accidental little fragments.

RP: You mentioned that this piece can be read either way—top-to-bottom or bottom-to-top. I initially read this top-down, but reading it from bottom-to-top (so, chronologically) makes the time gap between the Ring notification and the final Boost notification so much more unsettling (and, of course, the fact that the “Money Trees” track is paused, so we have to wonder where the protagonist has gone). Safety is one of the central tensions in this piece—the protagonist must sacrifice safety for the cost of living—and, in my reading, we’re piecing a life together from these notifications as though we’ve found the phone, but not the person. All that to say: can you talk a bit more about how safety and security functions in this piece?

MS: For me, it all boils down to this: the protagonist sacrifices her safety to meet the cost of living, but ultimately, the cost of living may cost her her life.

I also wanted to tap into that almost universal fear of receiving a Ring notification at an odd hour. A notification saying someone is at your door or near your window might feel harmless at 2 in the afternoon. That exact same notification at 2 or 3 in the morning becomes terrifying. It tells you that someone is there, but it can’t tell you who they are, what they want, or whether you’re actually safe.

That was important because Ring cameras, Maps, and phones are all supposed to give us some sense of security. They can track where we are, record someone approaching our home, and preserve evidence that something happened. But they can’t always prevent the danger. The technology can help tell the protagonist’s story after something goes wrong, but it can’t protect her while it is happening.

The two reading directions also change how that danger is experienced. Reading from top to bottom works almost like a mystery. You begin closer to the aftermath and have to figure out what happened to this woman. Reading from bottom to top, chronologically, feels more like a thriller because you follow her through the night and watch the danger gradually build toward the implied ending.

I love that the exact same words can create two slightly different genres simply by changing the order in which they are read. One direction makes you ask, “What the hell is going on?” The other makes you experience what happened.

I especially love the final Boost notification because it doesn’t only tell us that her phone service has been suspended. The phone has served as our narrator throughout the story, and now it can no longer continue telling us what happened. The phone remains, but the woman who owned it may not.

RP: Is there anything else you’d like to share about this piece, or anything you’re working on now?

MS: This piece was incredibly fun to write, although my back may never recover from bending over my desk with a ruler held against my computer screen to make sure every notification lined up and looked pleasing to the eye.

The visual precision became part of the storytelling process, and I really enjoyed creating something that could be experienced as both a story and a visual object.

I’m currently working on my first novel, Bogus, a horror story centered on Black boyhood, friendship, survival, humor, violence, and the supernatural.

Thank you again for this opportunity and for the care you and the editorial team have shown “Money Trees.” I’m incredibly excited to see it published.

Doomscroll Shortlist

Our Doomscroll writing challenge invited writers to explore social media, algorithms, and infinite scrolls across flash fiction, creative nonfiction, and poetry. We’re pleased to announce our shortlist, which recognizes the writers whose pieces were particularly exciting and inventive. Our finalists will be announced tomorrow!

“Mother Knows Best” by Jennifer A. Cole

at this point who knows” by Jose Hernandez Diaz

Replies to Top Comments on Instagram Reel of Pleated Woodpecker Scavenging Its Lunch out of Tree Bark” by Anna Lux Petro

“The Amount of Ricotta” by Veronica Tucker

Subscribe to our newsletter for upcoming writing challenges, free craft resources, and more.

Doomscroll Finalists

How does it feel to use a product that uses you back? Our Doomscroll challenge called for prose and poetry about living with social media, algorithms, and digital footprints. We’re pleased to announce our finalists, whose work spans a satirical essay on virality, a meditative poem about masculinity and online dating, and a flash fiction piece about grief in the digital age. We will publish their work online at the end of September!

First place

“For You” by Jack Fisher

Second place

“the blue hour” by Hero Jason Uchebenu

Third place

Salt” by Paley Dreier

Stay in the know about future challenges, winners, and writing resources by signing up for our newsletter.

BAD MEDICINE 💊 Our call for submissions closes Sept. 15!

X